The Terror Conspiracy: Deception, 9/11 \u0026 the Loss of Liberty by Jim Marrs

The Terror Conspiracy: Deception, 9/11 \u0026 the Loss of Liberty Reviews

• 
  Leo .

  Rip Jim Marrs. A recent article in the Washington Post had the headline that half of Americans believe 911 conspiracy theories. That is a lot of people. Not to mention the rest of the world, be interesting to know the figures. Whatever one believes there is a truth that something does not sit right with the official story with a lot of people. The questions do seem to out way the answers. Jim Marrs raises those questions.
  
  False Flags! Terror! 911 and 322
  
  Numbers and dates, confusing to me and you
  
  Assassins with double barrelled names
  
  Mind controlled and following the rules of the games
  
  The pawns, the scapegoats, the patsy, the Lie
  
  All recorded as official history, a big fat lie!
  
  MSN, official, OFF IS ALL! Off is the truth, from Ye and Me
  
  To bring in The Patriot Act, closing in on Humanity
  
  Off limits, the Truth, it is plain to see
  
  Propaganda and Rhetoric, spewing from the TV
  
  The black mirror, the screen, the shield, the Veil
  
  Bringing onto this beautiful Earth, orchestrated Hell!
  
  The chaos, the War, the Hate, and the Control
  
  Forced laws, acts, statutes, counteracting the Bill OF Rights, entrapping All
  
  11:11:11, 7:7:7, 8:8, Gematria and 33 degree
  
  All Freemasonic, controlled, manipulated, a Kabbalistic Tree
  
  These dates, these numbers, coincidence or planned that way?
  
  Writing the History, changing the Paradigm, it is all a Play
  
  We are characters, as Shakespeare once said
  
  All obeying, following the Rules, overseen by the Serpent’s Head🐯👍
• 
  Captain_Howdy

  Excellent place to start if you are looking for an alternative explanation to the official fantasy version of what happened.
  
  Gathering information from mostly mainstream media sources and government reports, Jim Marrs superbly presents a slightly different picture than the accepted perception of that day's events.
  
  If you find yourself looking for more thorough research beyond this, pick up Webster Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror.
• 
  Thom Young

  If you believe the official 9-11 story, then you should read this book. Can you please tell me how WTC 7 fell down? (the fires were just so hot..ha ha..yeah right) I'm just glad the 9-11 commission did a great job investigating it. (yawn) The biggest crime scene in the world and this is what we got? Sure was convenient to invade Iraq and Afghanistan afterwards. Open your third eye.
• 
  Addicted2Jeter

  A great book filled with tons of facts that every American should be aware of, but sadly most are not.
• 
  Chelsea

  A must read!!! Full of facts that the general public do not know.
• 
  Craig

  steel melts from a kerosene fire? yeah, right!
• 
  Ralph Shorter

  Marrs is preaching to the choir here, folks, and I have to confess it: I am ALREADY a believer, and have been for quite a long time.
  For those of you who are not believers, approach this with an open mind, and you just might land on our side of the fence even if you didn't intend to. It's pretty convincing stuff.
  I thought I was pretty well informed already on the 911 conspiracy, but I am discovering things I did not know in this voluminous text on the subject.
  Americans especially should read this point by point, and realise what they have lost because of The Terror Conspiracy.
  Some of the same sorts of things are beginning to happen in Canada. Decisions affecting our sovereignty, military, and the ownership of our natural resources are being unilaterally made while we the public remain uninformed. Who is pulling the strings of OUR politicians?
  Reading this book should sound an alarm to all Americans and their Northern Neighbours.
• 
  David

  In talking to people and reading various sources (including an installment of the Oxford History of the United States), I am baffled at the attitude of the average person towards those who entertain conspiracy theories. Those who do are considered flighty, filled with fantastic ideas. I've even heard the psychological profile mentioned that they are people who can't accept a simple world and must make it a more dangerous place through their wild imaginations. With all due respect, this point of view is just plain stupid. Not all conspiracy theories are created equal, but take Oliver Stone's JFK film for an example (a film fueled by the research of this book's author Jim Marrs). The film, JFK, raised a great many questions about things that don't make sense or aren't close to probable with the version presented by the Warren Commission. It presents a theory that, while it may be false, at least supports its claims in facts and makes a lot more sense than what we're supposed to believe. And yet, how many people have called the film and any alternate theory of JFK's assassination as "irresponsible", or just rolled their eyes in amusement? The absolute worst and most primitive reaction is to dismiss people as "unpatriotic" because they are supposed to believe in their leaders and military with the same degree of faith as a child does in Santa Claus. My question is, where is your rebuttal? Where are your facts that contradict what was brought forth in a reasoned alternate theory? Eye rolling and dismissal is a simplistic and unscientific form of denial. If you want to believe an official report of something and call a conspiracy theory as nonsense, then explain why. If it's because it's just easier to trust your government and trust your media, then you are naive. I'm not saying that the media and government are always dishonest, but why should you take everything they say at face value with no questions asked?
  
  I started this review with that tangent, because if your review of this book is negative simply because it questions all the official reports and proposes an alternate story that makes our government and military leaders look bad, then your opinion to me is unfounded. You have to take the claims offered in this book, and counter it with a source that shows this book to be a lie.
  
  The 32 pages of footnotes/works cited alone convince me of this well-researched book, based on official documents, that the tragedies of 9/11 were not even close to being performed in the manner we were officially told and by the people we were told to be responsible. I'm not saying that the alternate theory is correct in every phase, though it may be, but the mountain of evidence refuting the "facts" such as the manner of how the World Trade Centers collapsed and how it would have been impossible from a mere airplane crash, to the list of dead hijackers with most of them still being confirmed alive years later, to everything that is fishy about the Pentagon attack including the size of the impact caused by the reported airliner that struck the building...is overwhelming. The author covers so many angles and from many sources. This is not a work of an out-of-control imagination, but a well reasoned treatise of why the official version has too many holes to be trusted.
  
  My only complaint is that, while the book is well-researched, it is badly edited. There are a number of typos. For example Eglin AFB is twice spelled as Elgin. There's a sentence where it should be "America" mentioned, and it is "American" instead. There are plenty more grammatical and spelling errors. I realize this is basically a self-published book, but it would be more credible with better editing.
• 
  Sharon Murphy

  If this book has any truth to it, we are in trouble! Author contends that planted bombs brought down the World Trade Center and the conspiracy was our own government. Makes you stop and think a bit.....
• 
  Becky Herrera

  Pretty good alternative view of what happened on that day. There were a lot of boring or confusing hard to get through chapters but that was probably just me. Good conspiracy book!
• 
  Reza Hashemi

  I registered a book at BookCrossing.com!
  
  http://www.BookCrossing.com/journal/12102153
• 
  Christopher

  I found this book very interesting on what type of Conspiracy could have played a part in 9-11.
• 
  Whitney

  He said, she said, supposedly, this magazine, this editor, that girl, that missing document, etc etc etc. I'm over it. I can't keep up with the web of details of this and that supposedly happened, but no one has any proof of any of it! Yeah I said it. Show me proof!!! And I don't mean what someone supposedly thinks, saw, or heard. I mean I want full fledged, hands down, green light, copy that 10-4, undeniable proof of half the concoctions written here in this book. So President Bush stayed in the classroom minutes after he was told about the attack. What was he supposed to do?!?! There were children surrounding him!!! What's he supposed to do, yell "Duck and cover!" in an elementary classroom?? And for some reason this means that he was behind the attacks?? My foot. I understand quite clearly what the word "Conspiracy" means. It means it's an idea that things are not as black and white as they appear, and there could very well be an underlining story, one that we as the general public don't want to hear about. One that's hard to believe. But all the "what if's" and "word on the street is" in this book having to do with everything BUT September 11th, is putting me to sleep. So therefore, this book is being put on the back burner.