
Title | : | The Promise-Plan of God: A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments |
Author | : | |
Rating | : | |
ISBN | : | 0310275865 |
ISBN-10 | : | 9780310275862 |
Language | : | English |
Format Type | : | Hardcover |
Number of Pages | : | 432 |
Publication | : | First published April 1, 2008 |
The Promise-Plan of God: A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments Reviews
-
The end result of Kaiser's book is a very coherent tracing of the single promise-plan of God throughout the whole Bible. Kaiser is clearly working an “old-man’s game” as some of my professors at Dallas call biblical theology. I was amazed at the breadth and antiquity of many of his sources. What Kaiser presents is a timely and relevant proposal for biblical theology, but he does so by relying on authors who were writing in many cases over a hundred years ago. I’m used to that sort of thing when it comes to patristic or Reformation sources, but Kaiser has a very firm handle on the theologians and biblical studies writers from the early half of the 20th century which seems somewhat neglected elsewhere. The effect is that Kaiser’s ideas seem fresh and new, but the sources he use suggest they really aren’t.
For the full review, visit
my blog -
If I could give this book six stars I would! Such a helpful guide to Biblical theology!
-
Though I didn't agree with all of the conclusions of this book, the general idea that the Bible is one over arching story and the necessity of seeing that helps make sense of so much.
-
Less than promised. The author attempts to treat the entire Bible under the structuring principle of "promise-plan," a graceless term that he proposes as an alternative to both covenant theology and dispensationalism, but which receives insufficient elucidation in the introduction. Even if promise is a biblical theme, it is not obvious that it deserves pride of place. Among the New Testament books the term is primarily Pauline, and even in those books may not carry all the weight Kaiser assigns to it. The writing is uneven and digressive. It is provincial, both because it positions itself within merely one subset of Christianity (Reformed and dispensationalists) and because the argument rests on a controversial conservative dating of the biblical books.
-
Kaiser attempts to distinguish his view from both Covenant and Dispensational theology, creating a new way to understand redemptive history. Not an absolutely terrible resource, but will not be looking back at it often, if ever.
-
0567
-
Quite good.