Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the \u003ci\u003eOpus Postumum\u003c/i\u003e by Eckart Förster


Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the \u003ci\u003eOpus Postumum\u003c/i\u003e
Title : Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the \u003ci\u003eOpus Postumum\u003c/i\u003e
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 0674001664
ISBN-10 : 9780674001664
Language : English
Format Type : Hardcover
Number of Pages : 240
Publication : First published June 23, 2000

This is the first book in English devoted entirely to Kant's Opus postumum and its place in the Kantian oeuvre. Over the last few decades, the importance of this text for our understanding of Kant's philosophy has emerged with increasing clarity. Although Kant began it in order to solve a relatively minor problem within his philosophy, his reflections soon forced him to readdress virtually all the key problems of his critical the objective validity of the categories, the dynamical theory of matter, the natures of space and time, the refutation of idealism, the theory of the self and its agency, the question of living organisms, the doctrine of the practical postulates and the idea of God, the unity of theoretical and practical reason, and the idea of transcendental philosophy itself. In the end Kant was convinced that these problems, some of which had preoccupied him throughout his career, could finally be brought to a coherent and adequate solution and integrated into a single philosophical conception. As Eckart Förster shows in his penetrating study, Kant's conviction deserves not only our intellectual respect but also our undivided philosophical attention. Förster provides detailed analyses of the key problems of Kant's Opus postumum and also relates them to Kant's major published writings. In this way he provides unique insights into the extraordinary continuity and inner dynamics of Kant's transcendental philosophy as it progresses toward its final synthesis.


Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the \u003ci\u003eOpus Postumum\u003c/i\u003e Reviews


  • Nathan

    I’ll say upfront that I did not read the entire text, I read the introduction. I am rating the intro and not the entire text. I liked it though, quite a bit, and I will definitely table it and complete it at a later time. The intro gives a good overview of the text’s movement and centra claims. Ok.

    This text is an essay on Kant’s final project. Much Like Merleau-Ponty‘s Visible and Invisible, this is a mysterious and esoteric text that was incomplete at the time their author‘s death. What’s more, Kant seemed to be an impasse. He pushed to the ends of reason and brushed up against its limits. For example, force is an a priori concept and yet requires the object to be determined in any meaningful sense. In other words, where metaphysics becomes physics, I.e, having a pure physics. Tracing the space in between physics and metaphysics proved to be enormously difficult. This walks Kant‘s trail, to the best it can.