The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief by Ben Macintyre


The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief
Title : The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief
Author :
Rating :
ISBN : 0385319932
ISBN-10 : 9780385319935
Language : English
Format Type : Paperback
Number of Pages : 384
Publication : First published January 1, 1997
Awards : Macavity Award Best Nonfiction (1998), Edgar Award Best Fact Crime (1998)

He is the Napoleon of crime, Watson.
He is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city.
He is a genius, a philosopher, an abstract thinker. . . .

--Sherlock Holmes on Professor Moriarty in The Final Problem

The Victorian era's most infamous thief, Adam Worth was the original Napoleon of crime. Suave, cunning Worth learned early that the best way to succeed was to steal. And steal he did.

Following a strict code of honor, Worth won the respect of Victorian society. He also aroused its fear by becoming a chilling phantom, mingling undetected with the upper classes, whose valuables he brazenly stole. His most celebrated heist: Gainsborough's grand portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire--ancestor of Diana, Princess of Wales--a painting Worth adored and often slept with for twenty years.

With a brilliant gang that included "Piano" Charley, a jewel thief, train robber, and playboy, and "the Scratch" Becker, master forger, Worth secretly ran operations from New York to London, Paris, and South Africa--until betrayal and a Pinkerton man finally brought him down.

In a decadent age, Worth was an icon. His biography is a grand, dazzling tour into the gaslit underworld of the last century. . . and into the doomed genius of a criminal mastermind.


The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief Reviews


  • K.J. Charles

    Very interesting bio of a career criminal in the Victorian era, working across the US, Europe, and England. Worth didn't do violent crime, and was deeply loyal to his partners (sadly unreciprocated). The unlikely friendship he formed with the chief of the Pinkertons is actually very moving, and his menage a trois with another thief and their mutual girlfriend who went on to marry one of the richest men in the world is just chef kiss.

    I would have liked more specifics on how they did the burglaries and thefts, but then I would. A nice sideways look at the era and a reminder of how extremely global the Victorian era was.

  • Batgrl (Book Data Kept Elsewhere)

    When I read a review of this in 1998 I immediately put it on my wish list. As a Sherlock Holmes fan how could I not want to read about the man that was possibly the model for
    Morriarty? (Quick
    wikipedia link for Worth for those who are impatient.) And so the book sat in my wish list, but didn't get purchased, because I was forever thinking it'd pop up in ebook form. Finally I gave up and just bought a paper copy, because sometimes you just have to hunt down books that have been on your list too long.

    (Aside: I'll also blame the airlines for reading this in "fits and starts," because they always force me to take a paper book for those times where you have to put your ereader away. Grumble grumble, etc. etc.)

    The book covers Worth's life of crime, the stories of his many associates and capers, and the theft of
    Thomas Gainsborough painting (
    this one) of
    Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. That painting allows us to hear the history of Georgiana, which is still interesting, and continues to play a part in the Worth story as he developed strong feelings for it. And it's also the story of the continuing hunt by the
    Pinkerton detectives - not for where Worth was located (they always managed to track him down), but for a cause to arrest and charge him.

    Short version (of what's to follow): the book could have used an editor for polish and tightening/removing a lot of redundant sentences. Thus the writing may make some readers frustrate/bored and skip over content to get to more interesting narrative. It is however a wonderful story and one that's not to be found elsewhere, only in small references in other books. This is really the only book that currently tells this story, and the personalities involved are fascinating.

    My main critique is simply that here and there, the way the author's chosen to tell the story is a bit hard on the reader. For instance he often packs into the story quotes by contemporary authors. This in itself is not the problem (in fact I love period literature and journalism). The problem is how they're worked into the text.

    For example, p 57:


    "Victorian Britain was reaching the pinnacle of its greatness, and smugness. "The history of Britain is emphatically the history of progress," declared the intensely popular writer T.B. Macaulay at the dawn of the Victorian era. "The greatest and most highly civilized people that ever the world saw, have spread their domain over every quarter of the globe." A similar note of patriotic omnipotence was struck earlier in the century in an essay by the historian Thomas Carlyle: "We remove mountains and make seas our smooth highway, nothing can resist us. [I skip a sentence here, sorry Carlyle]"
    ...For a crook at war with the natural order, such heady recommendations were irresistible. Huge spoils, and the social elevation they brought with them, were precisely what Worth had in mind."
    Doesn't really flow well, does it? And of course we have no indication that Worth read/knew of either of those quoted authors, but that's a separate problem.


    My other critique is that the author often repeats the same point in multiple sentences that don't necessary enlighten the point. For example, p. 92:
    "The Victorians' rediscovered enthusiasm for Georgiana was principally, if covertly, sexual: the chocolate-box coquetry of Gainsborough's portrait, when considered in conjunction with her racy reputation, was just the thing to send a delicious testosterone jolt through the average buttoned-down Victorian male. While they might appear repressed in sexual matters, a function of the fashion for strict outward probity, the Victorians were anything but frigid and knew a sex goddess when they saw one."
    This paragraph continues for several more sentences, with some newspaper quotes, all with the same information. If this were an isolated problem I'd not notice it, but the concept of Georgiana as a sex symbol was already emphasized paragraphs before this one, and mentioned again in paragraphs later. (And in other chapters as well.)

    This really makes me wonder if Macintyre (the author) had an editor to help him (who might realize the repetition) or whether he felt that the story just needed more length (padding) and that this was the way to do it. Because restating something previously stated continues to occur. (Meanwhile I keep thinking that the phrase "sex goddess" should have been used at the beginning of the paragraph to give it more punch, otherwise it gets a bit lost. Because it's the takeaway thought.)

    While these issues were something I noted, it didn't make me stop reading.


    Random quotes, etc., that interested me (adding while reading, so in order, as usual):

    ...All this within the same paragraph, p. 74:
    "The contrast between outward protestations and actual behavior was particularly acute in the area of sexual morality, for while the prudish "official" line taken by most ethical commentators stressed home, hearth, and sex within marriage, or preferably not at all... The Victorians, it should be remembered, were the first to publish pornography on an industrial scale. ...If Worth held to a set of high-minded convictions that were utterly at variance with his actions, he was by no means alone. He would have enjoyed Wilde's ironic quip in The Importance of Being Earnest: "I hope you have not been leading a double life, pretending to be wicked and being really good all the time. That would be hypocrisy." "
    Like 'Georgiana, sex goddess,' the phrase 'Victorians: industrial scale porn producers' is going to stick in my brain.

    ...I loved that a lady long dead could have such an effect on popular culture, p. 115:
    "If, before the theft, the Duchess [the painting] had achieved iconic status, now women positively wanted to be her. She became the haute-couture statement of the hour. The theft proved a blessing to London's hatmakers, since "at most of the public ceremonials a large proportion of the ladies dressed upon the model which the painting provided." Vast ostrich-feather hats became the rate on both sides of the Atlantic, and in New York "the Gainsborough hat...was so fashionable among women (that) one fashionable modiste went so far as to call it the 'Lady Devonshire style.'" "
    First quote in that paragraph was from the New York Herald of 1897, the second from the New York Sun of 1894. The history buff in me would have felt those quotes would have benefited more from acknowledging the source (not just in endnotes), since the author constantly quotes both period literature, news papers, and current histories throughout the book, and the reader isn't always made aware of the source of info. Which does tend to allow you to weigh what information is more valid. But then, the author does directly cite sources sometimes and I'm sure that doing so too often would break up the flow of the story.

    ...Thanks to the photos provided I really disagree about this, p.126:
    "Kitty Flynn was undoubted part of the key to Worth's change of heart... The former Irish barmaid and the late Duchess of Devonshire, whose piquant history was now enjoying a second lease on life after the theft, had many of the same character traits... The physical resemblance of the two woman was equally striking. The best portrait of Kitty shows her with a teasing, pouting expression which might have been borrowed directly from Georgiana."
    Looking at the photo of Kitty the author's referring to (
    this one, on
    this page) and the painting (
    this one) I can see no real resemblance. I can see a parallel in Kitty's duchess-like attitude, as the author portrays her, but I think any physical resemblance is wishful thinking.

    ...An example of the author bringing in contemporary literature, p. 147-148:
    "There is an uncanny resemblance in Worth's behavior, to that of Captain Nemo in Jules Verne's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, but whether the culture-hungry crook read the book, published ten years earlier, will never be known. Captain Nemo is the archetypal criminal aesthete whose gallery contained "thirty or so paintings by famous masters...a vertitable museum..."
    [Skipping 3 sentences comparing Worth to Nemo]
    ...Where Verne's villain has his Nautilus and his sumptuous gallery to prove his superiority and rebellion, Worth had his false-bottomed trunk; where Nemo has thirty Old Masters, Worth had one."
    I really don't think this is a good quote for the situation - I mean, I can certainly see the parallels, but it's something I could see being discussed in a lit class, not relevant in a history text. Especially since there's no indication that Worth even read or knew of Verne, something the author admits in the first sentence.

    Again, this is not the first time the author pulls a literary quote in a way that has very little/nothing to do with the history, isn't useful as background, and isn't useful to set the scene. Not a good way to use a literary quote.

    ...I feel like I'm being too critical - here's the type of info that makes me keep reading, p. 159:
    "The uncut diamonds, quickly divided and mounted to prevent them from being traced, were then sold just a few feet away from the scene of the crime...
    ...the robbery "had the effect of causing the authorities of the postal department to place in almost every post office the wire-net protection of the counters with which we are all familiar..." "
    Security measures changed all over the country due to Worth's methods in robbery, but also forgery and other scams. Definitely a noteworthy figure. Also continually amazing that he doesn't get caught.

    ...On page 212 the author mentions a 1945 book called Kitty, by
    Rosamond Marshall which makes a hash of Kitty Flynn's [Worth's one time girlfriend whom he fathered two children with and supposedly always loved] actual history but is apparently a bodice-ripper romance (and also a
    film). I stumbled into finding an copy you can read online via Open Library (
    here) and have now wandered too to read it (reviewing it
    here, spoiler, it is indeed very bad). (This is how I end up reading multiple books at once. I often just sort of wander into it.)

    ...Oddly my copy of the book doesn't have a table of contents. (Or does the book not have one? That makes no sense.) The important point here for Sherlock Holmes fans is that Chapter 23: Alias Moriarty is where you'll find that bit of pop culture history. This is actually the chapter I've really been waiting for. It refers to the many aspects of Moriarty inspired by Worth, and makes specific references to historic and academic figures who link the two. Also specific story references, such as, in The Valley of Fear, Moriarty has a picture hanging on his wall that Holmes notes is "a picture by Greuze entitled 'La Jeaune Fille a l'agneau,' fetched not less than four thousand pounds." While "a 'agneau" is French meaning either from Agneau or perhaps something about a lamb - there's also the pun of l'agneau/Agnew - the later name is the art dealer who owned the Duchess painting. And it was a pun popular elsewhere at the time. That and other hints in the story (as well as other stories) point to Moriarty as Worth. That's one example - the chapter is short but for Holmes fans is definitely of interest. Sadly it's too short. For all the literary quotes elsewhere I'd have thought this chapter might be a tad longer.

    And still unsure about the reference(p. 229) to Worth as T.S. Eliot's cat
    Macavity - but I guess everything with a "Napoleon of Crime" tag could lead back to Worth. Maybe.

    ...Boy do I dislike some of Worth's family members (brother and sister-in-law). You can't be religious and deride the man on one hand for being a crook and then at the same time tell him he has to give you money or you'll abandon his kids that you're taking care of for him.

    ...In the William Pinkerton-Adam Worth relationship, which should be adversarial, there's a continuing theme of respect between the two men. One of the best parts of this story - especially since it happens to be true.

    ...Worth and
    J. Pierpont Morgan, p. 263: "They never met but their lives were eerie echos of each other..." - Like some of the other comparisons, this only seems true for some of the points made in this chapter.

    ...p. 275 - Apparently
    Henry James' final novel,
    The Outcry, has a wealthy American, Breckenridge Bender, buying a family portrait called the Duchess of Waterbridge by Sir Joshua Reynolds, which doesn't exist in reality and is supposed to be a reference to the Duchess of Devonshire (Georgina) painting bought by Morgan. James was upset with Morgan and other Americans carrying off famous British artwork that he felt should remain within the country, and the book was his protest. (Another book for the To Read list.)

  • Gerry

    Having been killed in at the Second Battle of Bull Run in the American Civil War, one would have thought that Adam Worth's life was over. But, no it was not for he faked his death and then became a professional 'bounty jumper', earning himself plenty of money into the bargain.

    Thus began his life of crime and another soldier in the Union Army was later to comment on this part of Worth's career. He was none other than William Pinkerton, later of the famous detective agency and someone who not only kept a keen eye on Worth, or Henry Judson Raymond as he became known, but who, despite the pair being on the opposite sides of the law, befriended and even helped him.

    Worth's serious life of crime began in a relatively small way but he quickly built up his coterie of associates and was then able to mastermind many robberies without even taking part himself. But he wasn't averse to playing a leading role when the occasion demanded.

    He had plenty of lady friends and was in a three-way relationship with one of his associates and that gentleman's wife, a liaison that produced two children, of which he was said to be the father. He then set up an American Bar in Paris and although the authorities kept watch on it, for it was not only the rendezvous for many a criminal, there was illegal gambling upstairs, the operation thrived for quite some time. One reason for the continued success was that Worth was well in with the Parisian authorities, one of whom would tip him off prior to any raid.

    He continued his various affairs, both criminal and romantic, in the latter category with such as Kitty Flynn, before relocating to London where he became, at least ostensibly, the perfect English gentleman. And it was in London that he performed his most notorious feat when he robbed Agnew's Gallery of its prized possession, a Thomas Gainsborough portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire. It was with Georgiana, the Duchess, who he was to have his longest love affair for she remained with him for over 20 years.

    He carried her with him wherever he went and although he was suspected of the crime nobody, not even William or Robert Pinkerton, could pin the crime on him. But when committing a robbery in Belgium he was pinned down, captured, tried and imprisoned.

    Despite his influence and influential friends he remained in prison for some time but when he was released he returned to London, with the Pinkertons passing on this information to their Scotland Yard counterparts.

    His doings had been widely reported in the press and it was from these reports that the author suggests that Arthur Conan Doyle formed his idea for Sherlock Holmes' arch-enemy Moriarty. The author points out similarities between the pair and there is no doubt that Conan Doyle perhaps did use some of Worth's characteristics to create Moriarty. But I must confess, I am not totally convinced by the totality of the tale and when it is suggested that McAvity, T S Eliot's deceitful and suave cat, may also be based on Worth, my credibility is stretched to its limit.

    However, Worth, who continued his criminal activities to earn money on which to live, eventually wanted to return the Duchess to its rightful owners so he set up a deal, with the help of William Pinkerton and with a sum of money as reward to be passed on to him, to return it to its rightful owner.

    This deal was eventually completed and with Agnews in possession once more of the Gainsborough, Pierpoint Morgan, whose family was about to purchase the painting when it first went missing, stepped in and became the new owner. It passed out of their family much later and was sold, back to the Duke of Devonshire at Chatsworth, for the princely sum of £265,500.

    On 8 January 1902, just four days after Morgan had taken possession of the Duchess, Worth died of heart failure at the age of 56 and he was buried in an unmarked grave at Highgate Cemetery. The 'New York Journal' proclaimed, 'Adam Worth is dead. His demise marks the closing of a singular modern romance.' And there is no doubt that is a true statement for he was a cool, charismatic character who played a leading part in the Victorian underworld and Ben Macintyre's biography certainly does him full justice.

  • Ron

    “[He had] plenty of time for morals; it was laws he disdained.”

    Award-winning well-researched and written biography of a criminal no one heard of … even in his own day. His most infamous crime was the theft of a Gainsborough portrait, then the highest priced art in the world. Along the way, he burglarized, robbed, or forged on five continents and became the model for one of literature’s most famous criminal: Arthur Conan Doyle’s Professor Moriarty.

    “Crime need not involve thuggery.”

    A notable difference between Adam Worth and the fictional crime lord is that Worth avoided violence. He regarded carrying, much less using, fire arms a sign of incompetence. But he did not hesitate to lie, cheat and steal his way to the heights of society, starting with faking his own death during the American Civil war.

    “The Darwinian struggle for survival, which is after all a struggle without morals.”

    Macintyre is exhaustive in his documentation despite having few sources. Worth was uncooperative that way. Repetitive at time, Macintyre propels the reader through Worth’s amazing life and times. Late Victorian England anticipated current America.

    “You cannot get a thing right for a newspaperman … if you write the facts down to him he will change them about to suit himself.” William Pinkerton

    Perhaps the most startling thread is the master criminal’s relationship with William Pinkerton, the world famous detective. The latter chased the former across several continents and ended by performing an extraordinary service for the then old, dying reprobate.

    “Glorying equally in his real wickedness and his apparent probity.”

    In the late nineteenth century international justice cooperation was just beginning. (Odd that not extradition existed between the US and UK.) A nimble crook could stay one step ahead of the law. Worth literally cruised the world looking for opportunities to separate the rich from the burden of their wealth. No Robin Hood, Worth did take care of his own people (even when they didn’t take care of him) and his friends and family.

    “Empowerment by fraud struck a chord with thousands outside the genteel upper stratum.”

    Macintyre follows Worth through the stealing and wasting of several fortunes, detailing his relationship with both real and bogus upper crust, not to mention some of the most daring crimes of the century.

    “… about as correct as a newspaper ever gets anything.” William Pinkerton

    A good read.

    “There’s money in it.”

  • Kay

    What a disappointment! It sounded like a terrific book, and I'd recently read another book by McIntyre that was quite engaging. Briefly, Adam Worth was the man whom Arthur Conan Doyle modeled his fictional Professor Moriarty on. Unfortunately, this book takes an extremely plodding approach to the subject -- it's a bit of a dull-witted bobby, if you will. There's lots of material here on the Pinkertons, a famous stolen painting, lots of double dealing, and a roller-coaster of a life, but it's just not told here with any verve or dash. It sounds like the author did a lot of digging... and then dutifully wrote everything.

    I wanted to like this one, really I did. I kept hoping it would get better, but it didn't. I barely managed to finish it, and I pretty much skimmed the last portion. It was that dull.

  • Cindy

    In-depth study of the life and psychology of a master-thief and the supposed inspiration of Arthur Conan Doyle’s Professor Moriarty (though the inspiration would not approve of the Professor’s violence). While some of the psychological observations seemed a far-reach, the overall study was fascinating. I found the details of the life of famous detective, William Pinkerton, as compelling as the analysis of Adam Worth. A simple summary of this biography would be “crime never pays,” but Macintyre forces a more complex response - one that hopefully finds as Pinkerton did - that there is a fellow human behind the criminal who needs mercy and dignity.

  • Mary

    Unlike the books by Ben Macintyre which I previously enjoyed, this one was plodding and dull with a text that was often strung together with quotes from other sources. I got half-way through before giving up.

  • Caroline

    Another good one by Macintyre, but for a change, not about spies in WWII, but instead a masterful criminal who led the Scotland Yard, the Pinkerton Agency, the French and Belgian police on a merry chase for most of his life. He died, was resurrected as a Henry Raymond, another famous individual who had died, and remained in this identity for the rest of his life.

    He led a sophisticated gang of criminal forgers, bank robbers, thieves and safe crackers. While he built his empire, he rose from his poor American origins to become a wealthy Englishman living among the cream of Victorian society, all of whom were unaware of the criminal mind behind this little dapper gentleman.

    His theft of Gainsborough's Duchess of Devonshire was simple and outrageous, and he kept her hidden for a quarter of a century.

    The details around his activities make for fascinating reading. He was extremely intelligent, generous and loyal to his friends and family. Until the later part of his life, he didn't drink and he didn't condone violence. He was larger than life and was the inspiration behind Conan Doyle's Professor Moriarty and Andrew Lloyd Webber's Macavity the mystery cat in his musical, CATS.

  • GoldGato

    Since I'm not a Sherlock Holmes aficionado, I didn't realize that Adam Worth was the inspiration for the famous Moriarty until I picked up this book. Worth was the most brazen thief of the Victorian Age, sort of like a Hitchcockian cat burglar of the 19th century. In this bio, we get to learn about the thief and his gang, plus the famous heists. I enjoyed the actual character of Adam Worth, as he kept to a stringent set of values that his enemies lacked.

    This is a decent good read, perfect for a fire and a cuppa.

    Book Season = Winter (London fog)

  • S. D. Howarth

    Seemed an interesting premise and the first half was fascinating, particularly with how much events influenced Conan Doyle. The second half, was more diminishing returns, whether due to sparsity of source, the eventual fall, or life and career petering out. Certainly seems a fascinating, gifted and contradictory character, and as elusive as his reputation.

    Well worth the read, to discover the man, and the relationship with the Pinkerton’s which was a surprising feature and turnabout. Would have been a star higher if better balanced, with the conclusion being work, more than inspirational, but appropriate to the story.

  • Redsteve

    Decently-written biography of the man who inspired Arthur Conan Doyle to create Professor Moriarty. Considering that Worth was a professional criminal who was only successfully prosecuted twice in his life, there is a surprising amount of documentary evidence (or at least witness statements) about his career - much of it in the files of the Pinkertons. The author sticks pretty close to the facts, although he does wander a bit into speculation about Worth's obsession with the Gainsborough portrait. 3 stars.

  • SoulSurvivor

    Another good historical biography of a famous person I'd never heard of. I like this better than the previous Macintyre book I read, but I need to put him aside because I have 5 books and counting that are awaiting me at the library.

  • Maggi LeDuc

    Super entertaining and had me rooting for Worth the entire time. A fantastic weekend read.

  • Ronnie Cramer

    Fascinating history that ties together a number of disparate personalities from the Victorian Era. Not as good as Macintyre's later works, but head and shoulders above most books.

  • Jim Stennett

    What a fun read! And it’s all true. Highly recommended.

  • William DuFour

    An excellent book on his crimes and friends. With a hat tip to the Pinkertons on who he had respect for and eventual friendship of all things.

  • John Fulcoly

    The story was interesting but I wanted more details on crimes and travels and such. But the writing style and repetitiveness wore me down. Way too wordy, too many stretchy assertions comparing people and his love affair of a photo. I have loved every Ben M book I've read but this one seemed like a different author. Good thing I didn't read it first. There are some interesting rid bits of history but only for the strong willed readers.

  • Ann

    This was an interesting book. It tells the story of Adam Worth who was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's inspiration for the character of Professor Moriarty. He was born in America and became a criminal at a early age. He built a gang of cohorts who robbed, forged, and cheated millions of dollars from unsuspecting victims. His claim to fame was the brazen theft of the famous painting of the Duchess of Devonshire by Gainsborough from a London gallery in 1876. He stole it and kept it hidden for over seventeen years before returning it. He was fearless and changed his identity whenever it suited and lived for years as a man of independent means on both sides of the Atlantic. He was even admired by none other than the famous detective William Pinkerton who assisted him in returning the painting when he had lost everything. The author does a marvelous job of telling his story and humanizing a man who could easily be portrayed as a monster.

  • Murray

    Though a bit meandering at times, I thoroughly enjoyed this book. Although it is a true story, it took on elements and twists and turns like A work of fiction. It seemed to me that many of the elements of this book - including interpersonal relations and motivations - served as archetypes in many film and books over the years. Most intriguing were Adam Worth's relationships with his henchmen, the many loves of his lives, and even the Pinkerton police. As a master criminal, worth was involved in many activities that relied on his brilliance and his ability to avoid detection, even while working with men less honorable than himself.

  • Nathan

    Though Ben Macintyre seems occasionally a bit too in love with his own turns of phrase -- and a bit too willing to sneer at others' -- he still crafts one heck of a fun yarn. His account of the sordid, thrilling life and times of Adam Worth, perhaps the last and the greatest of the genuine gentleman thieves, has all the twists and turns and memorable characters of any great novel. It's funny, intriguing, and, in its portrait of Worth's declining years, and his strange and wonderful friendship with the hard-nosed, ultra-right-wing detective who hunted him down, surprisingly touching.

  • Darla Ebert

    Started out in such an interestingly written fashion that I was glued to about the first 50 pages or so, then it kind of crashed and burned (for me). The style became more "bureaucratic", for want of a better term and bogged down in details that I did not care about. However, I've read other similar books (similar in genre/era/characterization) which managed to include those kinds of details and still made the reading interesting.
    I just think "The Napoleon of Crime" could have told the real story (as I think the author did) and still manage to be more
    readable.

  • Mitch

    Who has even heard of Adam Worth? I hadn't, but his story sounded interesting...and it was. Toss in a Pinkerton or two and you've got something there...

    So why the average rating?

    Well, that's because of author choices. The author chose to sensationalize a story that really, really didn't need the gilding. Adam led a unique, interesting life that required no silly comparisons or overblown adjectives.

    Less would have been more. As far as I know, though, it's the only biography anyone's written on Adam, and you could do worse...

  • Kristin

    The interesting subject material carries this biography along though the author included quite a bit of drag to the actual story being told.

    Ben Macintyre clearly did his research well and his insight into Adam Worth's motivations were very well thought out but I found his opinions on some other issues that were briefly mentioned a little too much opinion and less factual evidence.

  • Mark

    One of the most engaging pieces of non-fiction I've read. I blew through this one in a night and have shared it with many people, none of whom, to this date, have been disappointed. Riveting stuff for fans of Conan Doyle, Pinkerton detectives, fingerprints and thievery.

  • Lou

    Usually I get bored with biographies but this book is quite entertaining and contains facts about the life of Adam Worth who were not known. Also, the story is very good and always leaves you in suspense.