O Dia depois de Amanhã by Robert A. Heinlein

O Dia depois de Amanhã Reviews

• 
  Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽

  It makes me sad to 2-star this Heinlein novel that was one of my very favorites when I was 13 or 14. But it didn't hold up well at all on rereading. First you have to handwave pervasive racial insults and insensitities (American is conquered by an improbable "Oriental" nation that's a mix of Japanese and Chinese), then you have to handwave the magical scientific discovery that does freaking everything: kills people by race, cures cancer, builds huge temples, transmutes other elements into gold... And you also have to handwave the unlikelihood of a group of six intrepid Americans taking on the occupying forces with almost no trouble at all.
  
  My hands just got tired of all that waving.
  
  Full review to come at
  www.fantasyliterature.com.
• 
  Manny

  
  Bird Brian's review of Prayers for the Assassin reminded me of this steaming pile of crap, which I read when I was about 12. So the slitty-eyed yellow hordes have invaded the good ol' US and are crushing it under their bamboo heel. But luckily there are six all-American heroes left in this underground mountain research establishment, and they invent this incredible cool weapon based on superior Aryan science, and wow! even though they're up against four hundred million Japanese-Chinese-Vietnamese-whatever Untermenschen they triumph because, well, that's their racial destiny, isn't it?
  
  I may be misremembering some details. Heinlein wrote it in 1940; I would love to know more about his political opinions at the time, and how he thought WW II was going to play out.
  
• 
  Mike (the Paladin)

  I just reread this one and I want to update my review a bit. I like the book. Having read it back in the 1970s and rereading it again now I wanted to be sure I'd pointed out some of the things readers from the 21st century should be aware of going in.
  
  You'll need to remember the time frame in which this book was written. The racial attitudes on display are informed by WW2, Korea and America's situation with respect to "Red China". The book is I want to say up front not at all "PC". Please remember this when you read the book.
  
  There are words used in this book that we mostly don't use today. Also for African American or Black readers and Americans of Latin descent you'll probably note that you aren't mentioned at all. The invasion of America seems to be between Asians (usually called "Orientals" in the book a word that has fallen into non-usage) and whites.
  
  Again, just the times. I hope this doesn't offend and you can enjoy the book, but I wanted to give the heads up.
  
  I read this back in the 70s and like most of Heinlein's work I enjoyed it. It is at heart a fast moving story that keeps you interested throughout.
  
  Recommended but be aware it's very much from the era of the "Red menace" and also a time of wariness toward "Asian enemies". The take is not meant to be offensive it's simply meant to be pragmatic. During WW2 Japan had planned to establish an "East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere". That seems to still be in play here in the plot.
  
  Also let me say that the plot device is an interesting one and not really exactly like one I've seen elsewhere. Heinlein was a talented writer who inculcated his own worldview(s) in his writings in various ways. Most of the time (though not always) they don't overwhelm the story. There are Heinlein books I don't care for and Heinlein books I like greatly...I think this one falls into the latter category. The racial attitudes are of course easy for me to ignore. I do hope that they can be seen through so everyone can enjoy this book. Ironically Heinlein was one of the most open minded writers around if you look at his entire body of work.
• 
  Brownbetty

  Heinlein has his faults, I'll admit. Who can forget the ending of Podkayne of Mars where the heroine decides that captaincy of a space ship sounds like too much work, and instead she'll set her sights on marrying a captain?
  
  But until
  The Day After Tomorrow I have never actually been disgusted by a book of his. An amazon review charitably says it "reflects the fears and concerns of the time period he wrote the book in." Granted, in 1941, paranoia about Japan was probably sane, but he wrote this before Pearl Harbour.
  
  His premise is that America has been invaded and conquered by "panasia," a vast and sprawling empire bent on conquest. Only six men, scientists, who have just made an amazing scientific discovery, stand in its way. They use their amazing, not to say magical, scientific discovery to organize a resistance under the guise of a religion. This plan mostly works.
  
  Specific problems:
  
  * Frank Mitsui in the book is a man whose grandmother was "half-Chinese and half wahini," and his mother is "part Chinese but mostly Caucasian." Somehow he acquired the name Mitsui from this ancestry, and finds himself adrift in a country that reviles him, as do the invaders. He appears early on, is consulted as an expert in "Asian thinking" (it's genetic?) and has few speaking parts.
  * American=white is otherwise unchallenged.
  * There are no (perhaps one? I don't want to reread to check it out.) speaking parts for women in this book. Only two women are named, and one is dead before the book begins.
  * He appears to be an advocate of the "flying monkeys and magic" school of military thought. Sufficiently advanced science will assure that we win! And obviously, our science is more advanced.
  * The American spirit and culture raises America above other nations. Granted, in 1941 this must have seemed like an attractive message, but the book often focuses on the ways in which the "Asiatic" culture is deficient.
  * The, "OMG my plan is brilliant, really brilliant, would you like to hear about it? Too bad! But it's really brilliant. Okay, I'll tell this guy over here and he'll react in awe and amazement! See how brilliant my plan is?" gambit has never endeared me to anyone.
  * The magical weapon has whatever abilities the plot requires. Kill a man? Check. Stun a man? Check. Forcefield? Check. Cure the common cold? Check. Cure Cancer? Check. None of these examples are made up.
• 
  Jeff Yoak

  Modern-day America tends toward self-loathing. I often wonder if we could survive in the face of a persistent enemy with moral conviction. It is virtually impossible to find an intellectual that doesn't somewhere between apologize for America or just outright regard it as a villain -- inside or outside of the country. The attitude increasingly permeates through the rest of our culture.
  
  It is often one of the underlying things in Heinlein's work that I enjoy that both his personal values and the time in which he wrote were violently opposed to this trend. Perhaps Sixth Column is the best instance of placing that attitude at center stage. In the novel, America has just been taken over by Pan Asians. Their victory is complete and they're strangling the country and running it as a nation of slaves. We open with our hero delivering orders to a small military organization -- one that is exploring applying advanced science to the application of war. The military has essentially ceased to exist. This particular installation is unknown to the invaders. They are to prosecute the war independently in a last ditch effort.
  
  Our hero discovers that a breakthrough has been made, but coupled with a terrible accident. Most of the staff at the installation has died in the accident. Nobody knows exactly the nature of the breakthrough or what killed them all. Every line officer was among those who were killed. Though only a major himself, this leaves it to him to assume command of the couple dozen scientists remaining, fight an occupying major world power and to restore the United States.
  
  There is never a moment's hesitation at whether it is the right thing to do. There is never a question of not doing it. The only question is how. Heinlein highlights bravery, fortitude in the face of insurmountable odds, patriotism and overall spirit sadly missing from most of our culture. He never fails to spin a good story, but this work is inspiring as well.
• 
  Megan Baxter

  It would be easiest to review this like I have the stories I've been reading on Project Gutenberg - with a hefty dose of irreverence, and covering the sometimes astounding racism and sexism with as much humour as headshaking. But this is Heinlein, and it's not as easy to dismiss. With Heinlein, you have to tackle head-on the issues with many of his books, and, if you're me, admit that you still really like reading them anyway.
  
  Note: The rest of this review has been withheld due to the recent changes in Goodreads policy and enforcement. You can read why I came to this decision
  here.
  
  In the meantime, you can read the entire review at
  Smorgasbook
• 
  Ed [Redacted]

  Pretty disappointed with this one. The premise of this book is that the US was taken over by the "Pan Asians". The last remaining vestige of the US military consists of a few scientists and an advertising writer. Rather than give up, the ad guy decides to use the time honored military tactic of making up a fake religion and using the newly invented "Ledbetter Effect*" to beat back the yellow menace once and for all.
  
  The book is just absurd wish fulfillment. Utterly goofy and filled with racial pejoratives that might have been acceptable When this book was written, 1941, but is very jarring to read today.
  
  I am a Heinlein fanboy but I would skip this one unless you are a completist. Two stars including one just because I love Heinlein.
  
  
  *The Ledbetter Effect is the well known scientific effect of using radiation to do whatever the fuck you want. See also Alchemy or Handwavium.
• 
  R.a.

  2.4 — 2.6 stars.
  
  If Major Ardmore, Robert Heinlein’s protagonist in his first published novel, Sixth Column, were to experience himself, as a reflection in a mirror, would he see and hear this?
  
  “Bark-bark-bark-bark-bark . . . . . . Bark-bark."
  
  "Bark . . . . . . Bark-bark-bark."
  
  ". . . I think you have something there . . .”
  
  Yes. A kind of baroque, “terraced dynamic” quality defines Major Admore’s way of speaking—and acting. And, like the protagonist, Heinlein’s novel maintains this “odd” tone throughout.
  
  As Space Cadet, Heinlein’s second novel, is seemingly strange, Sixth Column, his first novel is likewise seemingly strange, though from a different perspective. Whereas Space Cadet surprises the reader with mature ideas within a young adult, (“juvenile”), narrative, Sixth Column strikes a reader as “juvenile-ish” within a mature narrative.
  
  Published in serial form, (which contributes to the uneven tone), approximately four months prior to the Pearl Harbor attack, the novel anticipates such a conflict and “plays out” a futuristic, full-scale invasion of the United States. From the beginning chapter, the United States is devastated. And, the PanAsian Empire, the enemy force, then sets about occupying and enslaving the native population. The “Sixth Column” title, gleaned from a military tactic used during the Spanish Civil War, describes a handful of Americans who then fight the enemy “from within” the occupying force.
  
  With such a premise, the author consequently presents a number of ideas associated with warfare and such an occupation: an autocratic-totalitarian state with widespread surveillance, race, genocide, eugenic prejudice, and terrorism. Additionally, he explores the ideas of freedom / independence, varying facets of religion, as well as individual morality—which he continues to explore in later novels. He also posits one horrible idea that becomes remarkable: that of “killing [the] culture.” The PanAsians maintain the “killing of [the enemy’s] culture” as a strategy to completely subordinate, then enslave, the “lesser” races.
  
  Heinlein succeeds in presenting a potentially horrific vision. He also succeeds in satisfying reader expectation for a science fiction narrative. However, “lucky” and “odd” incidences within the plot as well as a lack of character development push the speculative quality of the novel to an almost cartoonish extreme. And unfortunately, for a science fiction “war” novel, Heinlein creates scene after scene of “talking” or second-hand reporting instead of episodes of action.
  
  Yet, Sixth Column has its strengths, too.
  
  Despite the cartoon quality that ultimately ensues, there are a few scenes that create verisimilitude within the situation: the despair at the beginning of the novel, as well as the severe process for “drafting” military recruits. And, the scene where Thomas discovers a spy within the rebels’ first forward base, (the rebels’ first “church”), becomes quite dramatic and even brutal. The references to labor camps and “pleasure centers” where women are enslaved for sex further support the intended serious tone for the narrative, as well.
  
  By far, Heinlein’s various ideas and critiques become the novel’s greatest strengths. From including linguistic coded messages and chemical warfare, (an incident of a gas attack), through an incisive prediction of world overpopulation, to his critique, through Ardmore, of the political complacency of U.S. leaders, Heinlein, as expected, sets the American ideal of individual liberty in relief against the PanAsian totalitarian and eugenic projection of “superiority.” He also provides cultural commentary regarding the influences and corruptive nature of money, qualities of “the police state,” and the human need for symbol.
  
  Unfortunately, many of these wonderful aspects become thwarted by two particular plot elements: the Americans’ secret weapon, the “Ledbetter effect,” and the choice of using an imagined religious sect as “cover” while building a counter-offensive.
  
  The “Ledbetter effect,” while amazing in its scientific explanation, nevertheless becomes a “miracle” weapon. And, all PanAsian threats to the small rebel group fail to create a sense of risk. This “effect” weapon has a feature so deadly that a reader cannot help but laugh at the “cartoon magic” sense of it—despite its grotesque and horrific implications. Indeed, a riotous skit from Monty Python comes to mind.
  
  The created religious sect of “Mota,” (“atom” scrambled), contributes to the novel’s progressive cartoon quality, as well. Here, agents dress as priests, utter bizarre platitudes to placate their PanAsian oppressors, and bribe local officials as they screen supplicants as potential military recruits. The costumes, like the platitudes, seem silly; and, Heinlein poses a seemingly ignorant assumption about the PanAsian’s view of religion.
  
  One particular illogical and jarring episode involves Ardmore’s frustration toward forming a military staff. This oddity stands out since Heinlein makes the character a Major, a Field Grade Officer—an officer who should know very well the ways in which larger military organizations function.
  
  Further, the progressive episodes involving the haughty Calhoun character as well as Heinlein’s diction, “That’s swell . . . I’ll be a cross-eyed intern . . . Fortnight . . . etc., seem to bring the novel even closer to cartoon territory.
  
  Lastly, while Ardmore’s pronouncement upon the invaders is wonderfully apt and just, his final statement creates an uncomfortable irony. Indeed, he advocates a position seemingly as arrogant as his nemesis. Was Heinlein intentional in this irony? As an author . . . quite possibly. Through the Ardmore character . . . not likely. Consequently, this appears to be another blemish to the conclusion Heinlein perhaps intended.
  
  If, then, the reader were to experience Heinlein’s first novel, Sixth Column, as a reflection in a mirror, s/he would see in that reflection the author’s second novel, Space Cadet, since it stands as a complete reversal to his first. Left becomes right; and, right becomes left—in reflection.
  
  As Space Cadet proposes a positive future anchored in “Peace,” Sixth Column proposes a negative future anchored in war and oppression.
  
  And so, per Major Admore, remember:
  
  "A good PanAsian is a dead PanAsian," and,
  
  "Good Hunting!”
  
  
  Recommended
  for Heinlein & Science Fiction Readers, (2.5 — 2.6 Stars).
  
  Not Recommended
  for All Other Readers, (2.4 Stars).
  
• 
  Craig

  Heinlein's first published novel, which also appeared under the title of The Day After Tomorrow, was serialized in John W. Campbell's Astounding Science Fiction Magazine early (pre-Pearl Harbor) in 1941, and was first released as a book by Gnome Press in 1949. Campbell himself reportedly provided much of the concept. I first read it when I was quite young and didn't recognize some of the flaws and weaknesses it contained, though I remember not liking it quite as well as his "juveniles" that I'd previously explored. It's the patriotic story of Yankee can-do spirit and ingenuity prevailing over the overwhelming forces of evil. Like many young fans of the day, Heinlein was my unquestioned hero for years.
  I recently checked this audio version out of my local library to revisit the story; it didn't hold up as well. The racist and sexist overtones that didn't bother the juvenile me were impossible to overcome this time around. There was a line about the white men growing beards because it made the Oriental men feel weak and inferior, like women (wince!) , and the conquering Asians are frequently referred to with derogatory and racist phrases. And I was a little more hesitant to accept the idea that a half-dozen guys could invent a magic wand and defeat a whole continent full of experienced soldiers. In historical context I think it's still an entertaining story (I wonder how I missed the fact the first time around that the name of the Great God Mota is atom spelled backwards?), but it's far from Heinlein's best.
• 
  Monica

  En él caso de ‘el día de pasado mañana’ (‘sexta columna’ en su título original , alusión a la permanente ocultación del contraataque al enemigo mientras se estudian sus puntos flacos). Nos enfrentamos a un Heinlein que expone a nivel narrativo una distopia post apocalíptica en EEUU, que ha sido prácticamente destruido y totalmente invadido por los Panasiáticos (algo así como un cruce de los Hindúes con los orientales, los cuales han dominado prácticamente el planeta y los continentes por lo que deja entrever el maestro). Por lo cual, un puñado de supervivientes, entre militares y científicos (los principales son: Admore de inteligencia militar y su mano derecha Thomas, además del antiguo coronel Calhoun del departamento de investigación), resolverán a agruparse y defender su antiguo estado, volviéndolo a recuperar de modo encubierto, mediante la fundación de un nuevo dogma religioso entre el millar existentes en variación; la del Dios Mota. Esto hará que pasen totalmente desapercibidos, propagando una insurgencia social y aparentemente pasiva... no si algún que otro conflicto de por medio, en lo que el nuevo dominio oriental cree en un modo más de actuar de los siervos humanos mundanos.
  El panorama que nos presenta el autor es de un continente desolado, forzado por la ‘Ley de no intervención’después de varias guerras (con la dirección de los soviéticos a los Chinos, y después a los Norteamericanos) y sin ‘antifaces’ con pases marcados para todos sus habitantes, que les hacen vivir y gozar del sol por orden del emperador Panasiático, totalmente fascista y totalitarista, pero que no es tan disparatado en según que sitios. El análisis que hace es que la opresión está en todas partes, y la libertad se juzga del modo en la balanza que tú te encuentres, o las cartas que te toquen, según se vea. Algo que es remarcable es el tema de la memoria Racial, que según Heinlein es la causa de la invasión de éstos mestizos en la obra..Una clara alusión al abuso de los blancos contra los demás a lo largo de la historia.
  Todo esto previamente explicado es porqué, y siendo escrito en plena post II guerra mundial, al hombre, presumo, se le tildaría de plena resaca emocional de ésta, pero creo que fue bien deliberadamente, ( ya os digo que opto por ésta segunda conjetura, pues he leído mucho sobre el maestro, de la misma época, y es casi toda la demás narrativa es totalmente opuesta en discurso) cómo abordó la trama y desarrollo a nivel propagandístico- folletinesco. Si aquí el estilo Heinleiniano se encrudece, excede en acidez y grosería al nombrar de forma racista a los dominantes ficticios de la obra como monos y otras perlas..cosa bastante excepcional, sino excepcional del todo (como anteriormente lo que comentado, pero quería recalcarlo); y es que él era mucho más elegante, y sobretodo, más intolerante a nivel generalizado...vamos, que no es sólo cuestión de color o credo que Heinlein critique a un sector en concreto. Porqué eso, particularmente, lo hace con sus compatriotas; y aquí en forma de mascarada para complacer al gran público.
  La calidad de la obra, pese a resentirse un pelín a nivel equitativo, no es para nada mala, y la destreza Heinleiniana, marca de la casa, es innegable. Haciendo que te leas en dos u tres sentadas dicha novela, debido a su buena dosis de acción dialogada y de ‘avanzadilla’.
  En añadidura a esto, tenemos la siempre efectiva y convincente línea paralela al desarrollo del argumento, la filosófica critica Heinleiniana, que disecciona la fe, la política y la sociedad, con especial hincapié en la primera. Un símil del tono de ‘Forastero en tierra extraña’ y’ Tiempo para amar’ pero sin el refinamiento y la sensación de Epopeya de ésas, sino con la mofa como guía, simplemente. Aún así, leer el libro es sentar los precedentes de lo que posteriormente se daría de manera más ambiciosa, y con más solera elaborativa.
  En el apartado científico, Heinlein vuelve a ser cuasi profético pues a través del descubrimiento por parte de los insurgentes, el que ellos denominan ‘El efecto Ledbetter’; que exprimido al máximo, divide el átomo a placer, jugando con la invisibilidad, la edificación hasta límites insospechados; los diferentes campos materiales y su no materialización (ocultar estancias o personas asimismo, entre otros menesteres....muy útiles para la guerra, transformar átomos del metal en Nitrógeno para disolverse en el aire, frecuencias perturbadoras de onda hacía determinado sector vivo y hacia las comunicaciones, la explosión Coloidal de las células del cuerpo, y hasta la curación del Ántrax). Estando escrita en los 40, el bueno de Heinlein nos habla de las bombas biológicas raciales, profecía aún en fase de experimentación actualmente. Muy alucinante, pero pausible si se para a pensar detenidamente.
  Otra de las cosas que me han sorprendido es que hay alguna escena sanguinaria explicitita en tan temprana etapa de su narrativa. Si bien justificada por el tono, principalmente estratégico, dentro de un marco de rebelión social.
  
  No es el mejor Heinlein, pero se lee y muy bien, por ser hábil en mezclar géneros, conseguir una atmósfera y personajes realistas en plena época Catastrófica, con ésa esencia chulesca e irreverente de lo que sería el ambiente cargado post guerra en los Yankees (con su engreimiento testarudo a la par que sumamente farolero y obcecado por su egocentrismo marisabidillo..así es como lo pinta tal cual. ¿creéis no es una crítica indirecta?), así como sentar precedentes en el género y por él mismo en éste caso, además de profecías en el apartado científico- social. Pues parte de ello está ocurriendo.
  Recomendado para los que gusten del viejo Heinlein y los que disfruten, especialmente, con las historias de estrategias militares encubiertas en tono jovial a la par que severo. Una obra liviana, a priori patriótica pero con mofa debajo de su ‘costra dorada’, que, repito, sin ser su mejor contribución narrativa, empero que guarda algunas buenas lecturas y visiones de fondo, además de, profecías.
  
  
  
• 
  Denis

  This was written by Heinlein, but the plot was a Campbell Jr. suggestion. This editor often did this with his 'stable' of authors. It seems odd that Heinlein would agree to participate in such a scheme, but this was early in his career and I suppose he took it as an useful exerciser - he was a self-taught author after all.
  
  Though a rather xenophobic story, it has some of RAH's flair and character but overall it is my least favourite of his works.
• 
  Emily

  How can a few scientists defeat an invading horde? By starting a magic religion, of course! Interesting commentary on both religion and race.
• 
  Simon

  I'm about a third of the way through this book and I just want to comment about the racism and bigotry presented so far.
  
  Yes, the characters are racist (both the Americans and Pan-Asians) but I think it is important to take this in context. Not just with regard to the time this book was written but with regard to a central premise of the story.
  
  After WWII, the cold war had begun but had continued to freeze well beyond the level it actually did historically. The Pan-Asian countries had maintained a strict isolation from the west and vise versa. This had become enshrined in law preventing any contact between the peoples of these countries for two generations. Knowledge of each other's culture, languages and religion became virtually non-existent and so this explains why the people (on both sides) had strong pre-conceptions and prejudices about the other side.
  
  It comes across quite strongly that the racist sentiments expressed are only that of the characters and not of the author. Indeed, there was one character, an anarchist hobo, who sees the Pan-Asians as just people, induced to hate, kill and conquer by their state just as the Americans were themselves induced by their state. In the eyes of this character, it is the respective governments that were the real criminals, not the people themselves. And I feel that the views of this character are probably closer to the personal views of Heinlein than any of the others.
  
  ---
  
  A quick word about the science in this story. It's a bit fanciful to say the least. According to general field theory, there are three types of forces: Electrical, Magnetic and Gravitic. The "Ledbetter" effect, utilised by the protagonists in thist story, involves tapping into the spectra (besides the electro-magnetic) that general field theory predicts should exist: electro-gravitic, gravitic-magnetic and the three-phase electro-magnetic-gravitic. I suppose field theory was quite new when this book was written but still, Heinlein's grip of it seems to be quite weak. Even with my very limited understanding of it.
  
  This isn't really a negative for me at all. I have no problem suspending belief and just running with it but I imagine that for some people it may prove problematic.
  
  ---
  
  At 140 pages, the story unfolds at a breakneck speed, never pausing for breath. The advantages of this is that you never get bored, are always on the edge of your seat. The disadvantage is that the author never really had time to develop the characters. They were this way one moment and another way the next. Virtually no time for narrative that didn't develop the plot.
  
  All in all, it is a barmy story with barmy ideas (see above) but it is an engaging read. If you can overlook it's shortcomings, you will enjoy this book immensely. Me, I don't have a problem with barmy.
• 
  Louise Armstrong

  Fabulous! Bearing in mind the date when it was written, it is still a great yarn with some interesting ideas. I love the way RH will argue both sides of a case - in this book it's fighting a war by advertising. It has to win my prize for the most convincing 'One man can save America' novel, ever.
  
  Jan 2016. Read this again and still managed to enjoy it. This time I noticed how careful he was to make it clear that it was alien ideas his heroes were fighting against, not just alien people. His portrayal of Frank Mitsui, who came from the same stock as the invaders, but was 100% American, was brief, but made the point.
  
  June 2014 yet another reading. This time I was interested in the anarchist who is supremely unconcerned by the invasion. RH is often accused of being a fascist, but I think his political insight is outstanding. The hero was startled when he met someone with a serene acceptance of the situation. Why wasn't the old guy upset by the evil behaviour of the invaders? I remember now what a powerful impact the answer made when I first read this book as a teenager: it's not one I would have reached on my own. The old guy didn't believe in authority, any authority, so the invaders were the same as the old government to him. You get good bosses and bad bosses, but his point was that all bosses are wrong.
• 
  David

  Also titled "Sixth Column", this is one of Heinlein's most controversial novels due to its racist underpinnings. Sure, he was writing in 1941, but it reads like so much revenge fantasy: PanAsians invade America, so the heroes, hiding behind a fake religion, invent a ray that kills only PanAsians. This, a whole bunch of racial stereotyping, and a friendly PanAsian who, as the trope goes, must die for his white friends, earn the novel my lowest rating. Over thirty years after reading it, I still remember the queasy feeling. Recommended only if you're a Heinlein completionist.
• 
  Fredrick Danysh

  Asians have conquered North American and America's only hope is six survivors in a military research center in the Rocky Mountains. Their task is to organize American resistance after coming uo with a new weapon. Heinlein's Naval Academy training shows through.
• 
  Joe Stamber

  Bit of an old curiosity this one. First published in 1940, it has an odd and outdated attitude to just about every subject it comes across. For those reviewers who whine about bigotry, sexism et cetera all I can say is... get a grip! It's a story (that means made up) and was written over 70 years ago - when we start telling writers what they can and can't write about we may as well give up reading.
  
  Like many older novels, Sixth Column is quite talky and ponderous, especially considering its rather exciting plotline. That it moves along at a reasonable pace is more due to regular narrative jumps than any sense of urgency in the writing. To be fair, the style is fairly typical of the era in which it was written.
  
  Sixth Column starts out with a few scientists and others, less than 10 in total, in a citadel under a mountain. Their group have survived a war that has resulted in the "Pan Asians" taking over the USA, but have been decimated by a weapon testing incident which is (sort of) explained later. This handful of men are on their own against the might of the cruel and evil occupying force that has enslaved the American people. Sounds like they're screwed.
  
  But wait a minute! Between them these few people can do anything! They have unlimited resources and can create/invent anything. Every time a problem strolls in, the solution is rushing in the door behind it so fast that it nearly knocks it over. The religon idea is pretty cool, but it's just achieved with hardly any fuss. And that's the crux of the problem. It's all too easy. Worth reading for its novelty value, but after that there's not much left.
• 
  Joe Martin

  I learned several things about this book. It was the second novel that Heinlein ever wrote and the first that he ever had published. That, alone, makes it interesting. It wasn't a Heinlein original story. The outline was from John Campbell—Heinlein just filled it out. The book gets a lot of grief for its racist elements. Both the foreword and the afterword make good arguments that those elements do not reflect Heinlein's own beliefs. (As if his later novels didn't already bear that out.) He did what he could to tone down the racist elements, but it is true that the story couldn't be changed too much without destroying the central plot point of the entire book.
  
  This book suffers from a heavy dose of pseudo science and a lack of well-developed female characters and secondary characters. Those are all strengths that Heinlein developed later in his career. But it is a rip-roaring good tale of how a native insurgency threw out a conquering force through a strong dose of psychological judo and religious misdirection.
  
  Recommended for fans of Heinlein but a neutral recommendation for everyone else.
• 
  SciFiOne

  1986 grade A-
  2004 grade A-
  2020 grade A-
  
  aka (original title) Sixth Column
  Signet 451-Q5912 ISBN 451-Q5912-095
  
  This 80 year old novel shows some oddities now. The basic society described, at least initially, is early 1940s USA with all of it's prejudices pretty obvious. Younger readers might have never even heard of some of the character types described. That contrasts with the science based technology which still does not exist! The best way to rationalize this is to consider it an alternate reality.
  
  Heinlein had to make a living and sell the story, so he had to write characters for the readers of the time. As a modern reader, if you can suspend your disbelief and adapt to the setting, it is rather good!
  
  Fair warning though, it does not pull the punches in places. It is not gory but it is during war and people die, sometimes rather personally.
  
  Recommended.
• 
  Xabi1990

  6/10 en 2010
  
  Distopía post-apocalíptica con unos USA invadidos por los Panasiáticos.
  
  Pero aquí tenemos a Mr Heinlein que, con su habitual estilo independiente-militarista-"puedocontodo "nos saca a unos rebeldes que tiran de ingenio e inventan una religión para jerarquizar la lucha contra el invasor.
  
  No es el mejor Heinlein, pero se deja leer.
• 
  Mark

  Here’s one of my occasional re-reads of Robert Anson Heinlein’s novels.
  
  This one is what they call ‘a fixup’, originally being in three parts in the January, February and March editions of Astounding Magazine, under the editorial tuition of John W. Campbell. It became a slightly revised novel in 1949, with the author’s real name rather than his pseudonym, and a little tidying up.
  
  Putting it in the context of Heinlein’s other writing, it was published as a novel after his juvenile book Red Planet and before Farmer in the Sky. As written by Anson McDonald, however, it was not written with the intention of being for the juvenile market, but as something more adult.
  
  I found it less satisfying than Red Planet and Farmer in the Sky, its adult voice both uncertain and unreal. It reflects the fact that it was written before Heinlein had had any novels published, and seems a little wobbly both in its concept and its delivery: something which would become much less noticeable as Heinlein becomes more confident in later writing.
  
  This lack of success may also be partly due to the fact that Sixth Column was based upon an idea given to Heinlein from Campbell, the only major work of Heinlein’s career to be plotted by someone else. It exhibits a more adult serious tone than many of his other stories from that time, yet still has that energetic over-exuberance normally associated with much of the pulp fiction of the 1930’s and 1940’s.
  
  Controversially, it centres on the concept of race and has been accused of exhibiting racism. The book was not seen as an artistic success by Heinlein himself, though fairly well received by critics at the time of publication, both in 1941 and 1949.
  
  The story is one of those that deals with the defeat of the American government and her people by the Pan-Asians.
  
  There are a number of survivors at The Citadel, an emergency secret research laboratory in the Rocky Mountains, who are our main characters. ‘Whitey’ Ardmore is the main hero, a person given the responsibility of trying to create order as the last representative officer of the military. Colonel Calhoun is the difficult leader of the remaining scientists. Private Jeff/Jefferson Thomas is our real hero (try reversing that name!) who in the end develops the United States’s intelligence network.
  
  Facing an invading force of four hundred million, the surviving men of The Citadel have a secret weapon: the Ledbetter Effect, a newly-discovered magneto-gravitic or electro-gravitic spectra, which, with development and refinement, seems able to focus on and kill selected people.
  
  Using a newly created religion to cover up their work, the team begin the fight-back necessary to rid the United States of her oppressors. Rather like a secret alliance between the French Resistance and the Roman Catholic Church in World War Two, the men become Priests of Mota and establish churches throughout the nation, whilst simultaneously training and enlisting support from loyal Americans. They are not the mythical ‘fifth-column’ of warfare, but a sixth column of resistance: as Heinlein puts it,
  
  ‘this would not be a fifth column of traitors, bent on paralysing a free country; but the antithesis of that, a sixth column of patriots whose privilege it would be to destroy the morale of invaders, make them afraid, unsure of themselves.‘ (page 36)
  
  What works here? Well, it is a short tale, yet one with pace. There are moments where the Heinlein we recognise later appears, albeit briefly, and signs of the Heinlein trademark of lots of little details dropped in throughout, to jolt the reader off-guard.
  
  Some of the comments made about society and religion, of the need for something to bind a fractured society together, are quite astute. The actions of ‘the common people’ in an otherwise paralysed nation are quite touching, although in these cynical times it is quite incredible how quickly people fall into line to help.
  
  It’s hard for me to decide whether this tale is a tribute or a criticism of L. Ron Hubbard, who both Heinlein and Campbell knew well. Campbell was an interested party in Hubbard’s development of Dianetics, and the idea of a religion being created to cover up other activities does sound like a veiled criticism that could be equally applied by its decriers to Scientology. It has been suggested by some critics that Calhoun, the stiff and rather disliked scientist who eventually ends up insane, believing himself to be an incantation of the god Mota, is at least partly based on Campbell himself.
  
  Whilst Campbell’s version emphasised the race aspect, Heinlein’s tried to make it more scientific and using the so-called ‘soft sciences’ such as psychology and sociology to make the tale work. It is no accident that Whitey has a civilian background in advertising.
  
  In the tale’s defence, the worship of science is not particularly original at that time. Atomic power as part of a religion was also used by Heinlein’s friend Isaac Asimov in Foundation (1942-1944) and also by A E van Vogt in his novel Empire of the Atom in 1957. Coincidentally, Van Vogt was a close ally of Hubbard’s and a convert to Scientology in the 1940’s.
  
  Publishing a story about Asian invaders of America that would have been written at least a year before Pearl Harbour is quite prescient. Sadly, it degenerates into a tale that focuses on the fact that the conquering peoples can be defeated as a consequence of being a different race, which is, at best, a generalisation. How would our heroes have coped with the Germans, no doubt of a similar genetic makeup to theirs, working their way across Europe at the time of writing, I wondered?
  
  Also rather unsatisfyingly, the use of a super-weapon created by scientists to defeat the enemy is straight out of the pulp fiction guidebook. The science used to create the weapon also allows them to do amazing things: carve a temple the equivalent of the pyramids (though box-shaped) out of a mountain, create gold for currency, stun people, make Asians disappear in a puff of smoke and so on. It makes you wonder rather why science allowed them to get into the predicament in the first place, though it fits very typically into that 1940’s and 50’s belief that science is unlimited and will solve all problems.
  
  There is a point made in the book that such results are based on research by a Doctor Fox in London in the 1940’s about haemoglobin, which I guess may be the precursor of DNA, yet the abiding impression is that it’s a super-science-invention taken to unrealistic extremes.
  
  So, too, the characterisation, and dialogue. The bad guys are ‘bad’, which seems to be for no other reason than as a consequence of their race. Beatings, torture, harsh treatment: the Masters seem to show no mercy to their slaves. The good guys are flawed but generally morally upstanding and ethically positive.
  
  There is one concession to adulthood more noticeable than in the juveniles: the killing of a PanAsian spy, so that their work remains undiscovered, is brief, though quite shocking. Heinlein doesn’t flinch from making the point that some will have to die if the Americans are to regain their freedom.
  
  This extends to the introduction of Frank Mitsui, a loyal and noble Asian-American character. Heinlein biographer William Patterson has suggested that Mitsui was actually added by Heinlein to Campbell’s idea to try and make the race issue less problematical. Heinlein tries to mollify the race question, yet it still raises issues that sit uneasily today.
  
  The dialogue is proto-Heinlein, veering between lengthy exposition (such as his explanation of the differences between a tramp and a hobo) and Heinlein’s later more overt lecturing, whilst combined with gung-ho phrases of the “Go get ‘em, Whitey!” type. Women have a decidedly low role in the plot, with women priests not allowed and their roles mainly consigned to the office typing and telephony.
  
  The over-enthusiasm of the dialogue extends to the ending, which happens very quickly and is so positive and ‘happy-ever-after’ that to my mind it undermines what has gone before. In a matter of a few pages, the book moves from a troubling warning of what could happen under a demanding overlord to an ending that washes all that concern away in a state of ‘America-wins’ positivism. This seems rather too simple and optimistic, though perhaps no different to the post-WW2 mood after the Nuremberg war trials.
  
  Although in the end this is perhaps rightly seen as one of Heinlein’s less-successful early novels, there are elements here to both enjoy and be annoyed by. Whilst very much a product of its time, there are hints and flashes of the brilliance that Heinlein was later known for. Whilst not an unmitigated disaster, it is, in the end, a rather disappointingly unsuccessful attempt to combine pulp style fiction with more adult ideas.
  
  
• 
  Joan

  Heinlein really liked writing about rebellions. This must have been one of his earlier novel length attempts over 15 years before his better known "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress". I suspect "If This Goes On" may have been written earlier than this one. This one is blatantly racist. The bad guys are Pan Asians. Lots of nasty comments about slanty eyes, yellow skin color, other sterotypes about Asians, etc. It was essential to the basic mechanism of the plot that the enemy be a different race from Americans, but not at all comfortable to read in 2017. The plot mechanism was that a new scientific discovery could distinguish between the races and that was the method of attacking the enemy.
  
  This one had more interesting science fiction aspects than many of his other adult novels. For that reason alone it should be of interest to science fiction students. Nonetheless, I cannot recommend the book to most general readers. The characters are stereotypes, rather than well developed people except for two of the main characters. Virtually all the characters are male except for the token female saved to keep her from being shipped off to prison camp and constant rape (never spelled out but heavily indicated). I really enjoyed the science fiction aspects, which he developed in a different direction and reused in "Number of the Beast".
  
  Otherwise there is not much to recommend this one. I recognized the racist elements when I first read it in my twenties (on my honeymoon, actually), but even then also realized parts of it were really well written. Heinlein was an excellent writer, and is justifiably considered one of the "Big Three" science fiction masters (Asimov, Clarke and Heinlein. All three had a good grounding in science that often seems to be missing today).
  
  This one is being tossed in the recycling bin. It gets 3 stars because it held my interest but if it wasn't well written it would deserve only one star for the racist aspect of the story.
• 
  Wil C. Fry

  I first read this 25 or so years ago and it smacked of racism to me even before I truly understood racism. Now, it's unpalatable and absurd. I did notice the parts Heinlein shoehorned in to make it not quite as bad (like Finny’s statements, or the inclusion of an Asian American character on the “good guy” side), but these did nothing to erase the premise of the book, which rests on white supremacist ideology. The entire plot rests on “science that [Asian] culture can’t match” (next-to-last page) and “the superiority of western culture” (page 16 in my copy).

  If one can ignore all that, and the pseudoscience of the superweapons, the writing isn’t bad — the story is tight and fast-paced.

  (I published a
  longer review on my website.)
• 
  Nooilforpacifists

  The transparency of Cold War metaphor super-structure, and the cut-out characters, compel the story to crater.
• 
  Jason Cline

  Years and years ago Heinlein was my introduction to sci-fi, and I found his work fascinating. Stranger in a Strange Land, Friday, Green Hills of Earth, and the Lazarus Long stories were tremendous, and forced me to take sci-fi seriously. Sixth Column was a book that I did not happen to run across all those years ago, so I picked it up recently, as it had been far too long since I'd read any Heinlein.
  
  In short, it was a disappointment. Aside from some futuristic weaponry, there seemed to be little in the way of imagination in the story, and the characters were not nearly as developed as in his better works.
  
  I'm not going to go into plot too much, as I'm sure other reviewers cover it, but the basic premise is of the U.S. being occupied by the "Pan-Asians"; this was post-WWII, so the racist undertones can be forgiven considering the times. A marketing man and a small group of researchers take up the resistance in an attempt to bring freedom back to the Land of the Free. The marketing man, who's a major in the U.S. Army, is the closest thing to a well developed character in the book, but as a reader I never felt a connection to him, unlike Heinlein's other work.
  
  On the bright side, it's 248 pages, and it's Heinlein, so even with it's faults it was an easy read for me.
• 
  Kurt Reichenbaugh

  Only the 2nd Heinlein novel I've read. I've given others a chance but couldn't get through them. This one was okay as a novel of ideas about war, race, religion and politics, but there are is a lot of clunky philosophy that falls flat. Granted, it should be considered as a book of its time, and is another version of a story by Astounding's editor John W. Campbell, which was apparently wacky to the extreme.
  
  In this novel, a group of American soldiers plot the revolt against the evil PanAsians who've just conquered America. They come up with a science fictiony gizmo they name the Ledbetter Effect, which is essentially as powerful as Green Lantern's power ring. Green Lantern fans know that his power ring doesn't work on anything yellow. Well here, the Ledbetter effect is designed to not work on anything white. White meaning Caucasian. They use the Ledbetter Effect to form a religion, through which our heroes will initiate their followers to overthrow the evil Japanese/Chinese Empire that rules America. Another thing about this whole caper is that in Heinlein's world, no chicks are allowed!
  
  It's an okay read if taken from a pop culture point of view. It's pulpy and entertaining and short.
• 
  Ralph

  3.0 out of 5 - Early Robert Heinlein book: good, but not my favorite.
  
  When America falls as a result of a Pan-Asian invasion and America's defense forces have been reduced to six men (six against millions), how can the United States be saved? With advertising, of course, and by the creation of a new religion and use of technology based on the mysterious and all powerful Ledbetter Effect.
  
  This novel, written in 1949, does have racist overtones (which probably reflects the attitude of the country just after World War II) along with the use of the Swiss Army knife of technology, the Ledbetter Effect. The Ledbetter Effect is an extremely powerful and versatile technology that can selectively destroy or heal, slice and dice (foe and mountains alike), transmute matter, and more. It does it all.
  
  While it is fun reading about all the things the technology can do, the best part of the book describes how the remnant of the U.S. forces are able to wage battle (both physical and psychological) against the superior occupying force.
• 
  Ruby Hollyberry

  I've always gotten a big kick out of this one. It seems to be the logical extension of the saying about any sufficiently advanced technology being indistinguishable with magic, combined with the radical advances in technology pushed by a war - the worse the war the further the push. The war gets lost in the first pages, but the technology has been invented in time to save the pieces of a broken America from being lost forever. It's also a lot of fun to read, not so juvenile as the juveniles and not so involving and continually name-dropping as Heinlein's great books. So, it is racist. I see that. And I take it like I take racism in other old books like Raymond Chandler and early Hardy Boys: I take note, and I leave it where it be! Are we going to toss out The Big Sleep because Chandler was a racist old gay dude? I don't think so. Dear old Heinlein. He's like a father to me. And I can't stand my own father's beliefs either!
• 
  Gil

  An amazing reworking of a lesser plot by John Campbell, Jr., written on commission for $600 in 1941. And yet Heinlein forges an exciting story of 6 men who overthrow the vastly superior force of "PanAsians" using highly sophisticated science. Practically all the elements of Heinlein in his prime are here, so early in his career. And he manages to play down the racial aspects of Campbell's premise as much as possible. Definitely worth re-reading once you've read everything else by Heinlein.
  
  No, I don't believe in spoilers, and you will never see them here, except in the broadest of details.
• 
  Al "Tank"

  One of Heinlein's early novels that I re-read every year or so.
  
  I love it. I love the intrigue and the unique way the hero solves military problems.
  
  I'll definitely read it again.